Thanks to the UB3829 solution you sent me, I was able to find a bug in my modeling. When the Max value of the cover constraint was 0, soft constraints were being interpreted as hard constraints. This was a bug I made when automatically converting the .ros file. Accordingly, I apologize for the incorrect reports I have made so far regarding the instance 15 LB value. (There is no effect on other instances.)
I have now fixed the bug and discovered new LB and UB values for instance 15, so I would like to report them.
LB: 3827
UB: 3828
I think you can check the UB value in the attached data.
Incumbent LB=2826.36
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿